I have an eclectic list of interests, I've found. I discovered this in my last trip through college where I took pre-calculus, history, physics and chemistry for fun. Of those classes, only one of the chemistry classes I took was *required* for my degree, but. Well, the others were interesting, so I took them. It seems to be the story of my life. I become interested in a subject matter, find a way to apply myself and my life to it, and become absorbed.
I discovered something the other night. A new discovery! While Steve was rambling at me (admittedly, I only half-listen at best most of the time), I realized I actually understood what he was talking about. I paused, and turned to look at him in confusion. I don't think he was actually expecting me to be listening to him (in truth, I don't think I was, either), and I mentioned that I actually understood that. He paused, possibly carefully treading on this new development. I further ventured that it's ... frustrating ... that I can understand these things (at a basic level), but it seems to do me no good in my professional or personal life (I do believe my words were: I can't make money on this.) After some chuckles, Steve pointed out that I could, in fact, learn more about, what I lovingly refer to as, his world.
So, he pointed me towards Upstart, Ubuntu's beloved initialization ... ah, software. After a crash course of what does this do, "Oh, I never realized people actually *code* those things, I just thought that just happened. You know, fairy dust." "Dear, I work on the platform team. My *job* is to do fairy dust." and so forth, I started prodding further into the depths of "Well, geez, this is actually kind of fascinating." and Steve, being ever so helpful, pointed me to the manpage.
Now, it is said that a journey of a thousand miles starts but with one step. This step of mine included staring blearily at a black background with white text, much of which was almost incomprehensible, and then stumbling, if you will, over lack of subject/verb agreement. This offended me! I couldn't even comprehend the line I was reading because of the distraction of, "Oh my god. This was written by an Englishman - what the hell!" I take a deep breath, scroll down so the noun/verb agreement no longer plagues my attention span, and come across a missing verb in another paragraph. Again, the distraction is just too much. I pointed out to Steve I can't do this. I need a red pen or something. So, Steve handed me the red pen.
The red pen is called bzr. I got a new crash course; this one in submitting patches, as they're much kinder to the developer than IRC conversations or emails (or so I'm told). After 1/2 hour or so of fiddling with logins, ssh keys, accounts and setups, I successfully submitted my very first patch EVER! (Ok, 2 grammar fixes, BUT THIS IS BIG, PEOPLE. This is my FIRST ADDITION TO THE COMMUNITY! Honestly, I feel like I should get a ribbon or a plaque or something for this.)
The pride of my success was dashed, however. To be able to submit this glorious patch for a noun/verb disagreement and a wayward verb, I must read and submit my agreement to Copyright Assignment (where I've found further grammar errors). For grammar. For the Queen's language. For a fixed manpage that I can actually read (or at least have no excuses why my eyes are glazing over and I'm not retaining what I've just read).
All joking aside, I'm still quite baffled by this requirement. If I were employed by a company who actually cared about such a thing, would my contributions be ignored? I can understand being careful with copyright law, but is there a point where we're overzealous? Is there seriously concern that I will attempt to claim copyright to a noun/verb agreement and missing verb? I mean, as ridiculously funny as that sounds to me, I sincerely doubt that any protections need to be in place for that. Is there a similar requirement in Debian? Were I to submit a patch to correct a typo in a manpage, would I be required to agree to their Social Contract?
It seems to me that this is losing sight of community focus, a general concern of mine as of late.
I discovered something the other night. A new discovery! While Steve was rambling at me (admittedly, I only half-listen at best most of the time), I realized I actually understood what he was talking about. I paused, and turned to look at him in confusion. I don't think he was actually expecting me to be listening to him (in truth, I don't think I was, either), and I mentioned that I actually understood that. He paused, possibly carefully treading on this new development. I further ventured that it's ... frustrating ... that I can understand these things (at a basic level), but it seems to do me no good in my professional or personal life (I do believe my words were: I can't make money on this.) After some chuckles, Steve pointed out that I could, in fact, learn more about, what I lovingly refer to as, his world.
So, he pointed me towards Upstart, Ubuntu's beloved initialization ... ah, software. After a crash course of what does this do, "Oh, I never realized people actually *code* those things, I just thought that just happened. You know, fairy dust." "Dear, I work on the platform team. My *job* is to do fairy dust." and so forth, I started prodding further into the depths of "Well, geez, this is actually kind of fascinating." and Steve, being ever so helpful, pointed me to the manpage.
Now, it is said that a journey of a thousand miles starts but with one step. This step of mine included staring blearily at a black background with white text, much of which was almost incomprehensible, and then stumbling, if you will, over lack of subject/verb agreement. This offended me! I couldn't even comprehend the line I was reading because of the distraction of, "Oh my god. This was written by an Englishman - what the hell!" I take a deep breath, scroll down so the noun/verb agreement no longer plagues my attention span, and come across a missing verb in another paragraph. Again, the distraction is just too much. I pointed out to Steve I can't do this. I need a red pen or something. So, Steve handed me the red pen.
The red pen is called bzr. I got a new crash course; this one in submitting patches, as they're much kinder to the developer than IRC conversations or emails (or so I'm told). After 1/2 hour or so of fiddling with logins, ssh keys, accounts and setups, I successfully submitted my very first patch EVER! (Ok, 2 grammar fixes, BUT THIS IS BIG, PEOPLE. This is my FIRST ADDITION TO THE COMMUNITY! Honestly, I feel like I should get a ribbon or a plaque or something for this.)
The pride of my success was dashed, however. To be able to submit this glorious patch for a noun/verb disagreement and a wayward verb, I must read and submit my agreement to Copyright Assignment (where I've found further grammar errors). For grammar. For the Queen's language. For a fixed manpage that I can actually read (or at least have no excuses why my eyes are glazing over and I'm not retaining what I've just read).
All joking aside, I'm still quite baffled by this requirement. If I were employed by a company who actually cared about such a thing, would my contributions be ignored? I can understand being careful with copyright law, but is there a point where we're overzealous? Is there seriously concern that I will attempt to claim copyright to a noun/verb agreement and missing verb? I mean, as ridiculously funny as that sounds to me, I sincerely doubt that any protections need to be in place for that. Is there a similar requirement in Debian? Were I to submit a patch to correct a typo in a manpage, would I be required to agree to their Social Contract?
It seems to me that this is losing sight of community focus, a general concern of mine as of late.
There are 2 comments on this entry. (Reply.)